Decision brief: Where D-SNP and Medicaid Appeals and Grievances deadline clocks diverge.

Download eBook Download eBook
1
Checklist
2
Your Profile
3
Results
IDR Readiness Tool

IDR Operational Readiness Checklist

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can personalize your IDR readiness report and follow up with relevant resources.


    Privacy: Your information is used solely to personalize your IDR readiness report and for Inovaare to follow up with your results. We do not sell or share your data with third parties. By proceeding, you consent to Inovaare contacting you about your results.


    IDR Readiness Tool — Step 2 of 3

    IDR Operational Readiness Checklist

    Check every item your plan currently has in place. Be honest — accuracy gives you a more useful score.

    0 of 25 items checked
    1
    Case Management & System of Record
    0 / 5
    All IDR disputes are logged in a single, centralized system of record
    Not spreadsheets, shared drives, or claim system notes — a purpose-built or designated case management platform
    Each IDR case record includes full case history from open negotiation through determination
    All correspondence, offers, IDRE selection, documentation, and final outcome in one record
    Cases involving delegated or capitated providers are flagged and routed to appropriate ownership
    Delegation blind spots are a leading cause of unmanaged IDR exposure
    Batch-eligible disputes are identified systematically and managed as a unit
    Batch submissions reduce administrative cost but require structured identification and tracking
    The case management system produces a complete, auditable record exportable for CMS audit purposes
    If CMS requested your IDR case history tomorrow, you could produce it cleanly within 24 hours
    2
    Deadline Tracking & Timeline Compliance
    0 / 5
    The 30-business-day open negotiation window is tracked automatically for every eligible dispute
    Automated, not calendar-based or analyst-dependent
    The 4-business-day IDR initiation window is tracked with automated alerts and escalation
    Missing this window forfeits IDR rights on that claim — there is no grace period
    The 10-business-day IDRE selection window is tracked and actioned before the CMS assignment default
    CMS-assigned IDREs may not favor the plan’s preferred dispute resolution approach
    Deadline alerts have a defined escalation path if the responsible party does not act
    An alert that nobody acts on is not a deadline tracking system
    Your plan has had zero missed IDR deadlines in the past 12 months
    Or, if deadlines were missed, root cause was analyzed and controls were updated
    3
    QPA Accuracy & Defensibility
    0 / 5
    QPA calculation methodology is documented in a written, version-controlled policy
    Includes service code mapping approach, geographic region definition, affiliated contract inclusion criteria, and median calculation method
    QPA is calculated from versioned rate data — not recalculated from current rates at time of dispute
    The QPA must reflect rates in effect at the time of service, not current contracted rates
    QPA methodology has been reviewed by qualified legal or actuarial counsel in the past 12 months
    Post-TMA litigation, QPA weighting rules have changed — counsel review ensures your methodology reflects current requirements
    Each IDR submission includes a complete QPA documentation package — not just the number
    Methodology, data sources, version references, and calculation outputs presented as a coherent documentation record
    QPA records are retained per your document retention policy and accessible by dispute case ID
    You can retrieve the QPA documentation for any dispute in the past 3 years within one business day
    4
    Delegation & Operational Accountability
    0 / 5
    IDR disputes originating from delegated or capitated arrangements have a defined ownership and workflow
    It is clear who is responsible for open negotiation, IDR initiation, and submission for delegation-related disputes
    Delegation agreements include IDR accountability provisions — escalation paths and notification requirements
    Your delegates know their obligations when a dispute arises from services they manage
    Your plan has visibility into IDR disputes filed against delegated entities on your behalf
    You are not learning about delegate IDR exposure after the fact
    A designated IDR program owner exists with cross-functional authority over compliance, claims, and legal
    IDR managed by committee without a single owner produces accountability gaps
    NSA-related Corrective Action Plans, if any, are tracked through resolution with documented evidence
    CMS findings require structured remediation — not informal course correction
    5
    Reporting, Visibility & Regulatory Currency
    0 / 5
    Leadership receives regular IDR reporting — volume, financial exposure, win/loss trend, and operational metrics
    At minimum quarterly; monthly for plans with high IDR volume
    Your plan has real-time or near-real-time visibility into aggregate IDR financial exposure
    Potential payment obligations if outstanding cases resolve unfavorably are tracked and reported
    Your compliance calendar includes all CMS NSA/IDR reporting deadlines and regulatory update monitoring
    NSA guidance and court decisions affecting IDR rules are tracked and actioned through a defined process
    IDR outcome data is analyzed to identify QPA methodology issues, provider patterns, or service category exposure
    Losing consistently on certain service types or with certain providers is a signal, not just a cost
    Your IDR program has been reviewed against current CMS guidance and post-TMA litigation requirements in the past 12 months
    The regulatory environment has changed materially since 2022 — an annual review is the minimum standard
    IDR Operational Readiness Report
    0
    / 25

    ⚠ Exposed (0–10)

    Significant operational and regulatory risk. Priority: build case management foundation and deadline tracking immediately.

    ⚡ Developing (11–19)

    Core elements exist but gaps remain. Priority: QPA defensibility, delegation accountability, and leadership reporting.

    ✓ Ready (20–25)

    Strong operational foundation. Priority: maintain currency with regulatory changes and optimize for efficiency at scale.

    Domain Scores
    Your performance across the five IDR readiness domains

    See What IDR-Ready Looks Like on Your Platform

    Inovaare’s compliance operations platform connects case management, deadline tracking, QPA data infrastructure, delegation oversight, and enterprise reporting in a single system built for health plans. Book a 30-minute IDR Readiness Assessment to see how your plan’s gaps map to Inovaare’s capabilities.

    Scroll to Top